Texas Osteopathic Medical Association January · February · March · April · May · July\August · September · October · November · December · January · Web Classfieds · Advertising Information · Texas Stars Texas D.O.

Texas D.O. Online
February 2000

AMA Sues HHS

The American Medical Association is suing Health and Human services Secretary Donna Shalala for using an allegedly flawed Medicare reimbursement formula. The AMA contended that the HHS formula is based on three-year-old projections that undercount by one million the number of Medicare patients treated by physicians nationwide between 1998 and 1999. The AMA estimated that the failure to update the reimbursement formula has cost physicians $3 billion in the last two years, or an average of $4800 per physician. (Chicago Tribune, December 7, 1999)


Home Health Care Revives House Calls for Doctors

A small number of doctors are using the old practice of house calls in a new way. Doctors from one San Diego-based house call service make 900 visits a month to the sickest elderly. The cost of the system: about $150 a visit, compared with $2,000 for an emergency room visit.

Technology helps in the house calls. Some travel to patients with an X-ray machine, a blood-gas analyzer, an EKG and a cardiac-output machine.

House calls faded from the health care system 30 years ago when Medicare slashed fees for home visits. Managed care doesnít have enough clear-cut data on savings from house calls to promote them. There will be more demand for house calls as the population ages. An estimated 2 million senior citizens were physically unable to leave their homes in 1999.

Recent change sin Medicare payments have raised payments for at-home care by doctors. The San Diego house-call services have begun to turn a small profit and the company sees more growth ahead. (Texas Innovator)


Nurse Practitioners May Use More Health Care Resources Than Physicians

A study, which tracked 450 clinical patients for one year after assignment to either supervised nurse practitioners, attending physicians or resident physicians, found that nurse practitioners ordered more diagnostic tests such as ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging. The three groups used blood and routine radiologic tests similarly. (Effective Clinical Practice, November/December, 1999)


Arlington Memorial Hospital Begins $17 Million Renovation and Construction Project

The project will expand Arlington Memorialís intensive care area, add a heart surgery suite, expand the radiology department and add 18 postpartum rooms. The project will also allow Arlington Memorial Hospital to transmit via microwave radiological imaging and diagnostic reporting data to Arlington Memorial South Medical Center. (Fort Worth Star-Telegram, December 13, 1999)


Closings

Baylor Medical Center at Garland is slated to close its 21-bed skilled nursing unit this month. Baylor Garlandís Executive Director John McWhorter attributed the cut to steep reimbursement reductions mandated by the Balanced Budget Act of 1997, according to the December 13, 1999, Dallas Business Journal. The decision follows that of Baylor Medical Center at Grapevine, which converted its skilled nursing beds to acute care beds in early December. Baylor Garland has not announced how it will use the clinical space left by its skilled nursing unit closure.

Baylor Health Care System stated it is closing its Ennis hospital this month. Closure of the 48-bed medical center, southeast of Fort Worth, will require Ennis patients to travel 26 mils to Dallas or 17 miles to Waxahachie and will removed the only emergency room from a community of 17,000 residents, according the December 6, 1999, Fort Worth Star-Telegram. Ennis lost over $14 million since 1992.


Disabled Persons to Retain Medicare/Medicaid Coverage After Return to Work

President Clinton has signed into law a measure that allows disabled Americans to retain their Medicare and Medicaid coverage after returning to work. The law prevents any of the countryís nine million disabled adults who return to work from being disqualified from their government-funded health insurance, which previously happened if they earned more than $700 per month. The law creates $150 million in grants to states to allow disabled workers to buy into Medicaid, creates a $250 million Medicaid buy-in demonstration project, extends Medicare coverage and provides a voucher for disabled Americans who return to work to purchase private or government health care services. (Associated Press, December 18, 1999)


FDA Announces New Internet Website for Consumers

The Food and Drug Administration has established a new Internet site to provide consumers with information about buying prescription drugs and medical products online. By visiting FDAís Website at http://www.fda.gov and clicking on the "Buying Medical Products Online?" banner, consumers can now obtain information on how to protect themselves from dangerous online practices involving the sale of FDA-regulated products; learn about FDAís enforcement efforts; find out how to spot health fraud; and get a list of answers to the most commonly asked questions about Internet drug sales.

Consumers who suspect that a Website is illegally selling human or animal drugs, medical devices, biological products, foods, dietary supplements or cosmetics over the Web can also fill out an electronic complaint form provided at this site, and e-mail it directly to the FDA.


IOM Report Recommends Medicare Coverage for Nutritional Counseling

An Institute of Medicine (IOM) report recommended that Medicare pay for nutritional counseling for senior citizens when a physician advises such. Such coverage, labeled an expansion of Medicareís disease prevention efforts, would cost $1.4 billion over five years but would save Medicare as much as $167 million on hospital stays and other treatment over five years for beneficiaries with high blood pressure alone, cited the report. The report noted that 86 percent of Medicare beneficiaries, or over 29 million Americans over age 65, suffer from high blood pressure, high cholesterol or diabetes that could be helped by dietary improvements. (Associated Press, 12-16-99)


Two Managed Care Companies Fined by ERST

Aetna U.S. Healthcare and NylCare of the Gulf Coast were fined for the first time by Employees Retirement System of Texas (ERST) for breaching contracts with state employees. ERST fined NylCare $44,000 for failing to provide timely information and a Web site indicating benefits to state employees during its summer enrollment meeting. ERST fined Aetna $29,000 for failing to offer a Web site at the start of summer enrollment to help employees choose a health plan. (Fort Worth Star-Telegram, 12-9-99)


HCFA Says Medicaid Benefits are being Illegally Denied

A preliminary audit has found that states are illegally denying Medicaid benefits to poor families being dropped from welfare rolls. According to HCFA director Nancy-Ann DeParle, the errors are widespread and a crackdown is promised. About 40 states have been audited thus far, with the remainder expected to be completed this year. Widespread problems include: states not telling people they are eligible for Medicaid when they are discouraged from applying for welfare; state computers that automatically wipe people off Medicaid when they leave welfare; and caseworkers improperly hassling families who apply for Medicaid.


New Jersey HMO Will Cover Costs Associated with Cancer Treatment Trials

New Jerseyís largest HMOs announced that they will now voluntarily cover routine costs associated with all four phases of federally approved trials of cancer treatments. Officials hope the policy change by ten managed care companies, covering 4.8 million New Jersey residents, will boost annual participation in the stateís clinical cancer trials by as much as 15 percent. Legislation pending in several states, including Pennsylvania, would require similar coverage by HMOs, while Maryland law currently requires coverage of all four phases of cancer trials and Georgia, Rhode Island and Virginia laws require coverage of two or three phases. (Philadelphia Inquirer, 12-17-99)


Texas Cancer Care Restructures Relationship with OnCare

Texas Cancer Care is restructuring its relationship with the oncology practice management company, OnCare, according to William Jordan, D.O., president, Texas Cancer Care.

"Texas Cancer Care affiliated with OnCare in 1996, anticipating the relationship would produce cost savings and generate more favorable contracts from health care payers. Neither of these benefits have been realized," said Dr. Jordan.

"The business world is aggressively forcing itself into medicine," he said. "This experience confirms that high-quality cancer management and patient care demands an intensive personal commitment from the physician, nursing and supportive staff. That ideal is the fundamental path which we will continue to follow."

During the past three years, Texas Cancer Care has been a principal beta test site for the development of KnowChart, an electronic medical record system considered one of the most advanced information platforms for oncology. Texas Cancer Care will continue to participate in its development.

"This type of high-level information technology will dramatically enhance our ability to collect and analyze information about cancer, while coordinating focus of research protocols," noted Dr Jordan. He added, "Substantive progress in treating cancer is a product of a partnership between the patient, the physician, research and technology. Our new structure will enable us to maximize the benefits of that partnership. The restructuring will be transparent to patients, and services will continue without interruption."


Pressure Mounts to Reduce Medical Errors

Pressure to reduce the incidence of medical errors has been building in response to the recent report by the Institute of Medicine which suggested that medical errors kill 44,000 to 98,000 people a year. President Clinton has given a federal government task force 60 days to produce recommendations on how to prevent such a high number of errors. The Institute of Medicine has called for a nationwide, mandatory public reporting system and a federal center on patient safety to help reduce the incidence of such errors. The report proposed federal legislation to protect confidentiality of data on errors that have no serious consequences. The proposed center would set national safety goals, track progress and serve as a clearinghouse for patient safety information. The estimated cost of such a center is $30 million to get it started and $100 million to keep it in operation. (Fort Worth Star-Telegram, 12,26-99)


Why Americans are Hospitalized and What it Costs ñ Government Report

The most common reasons for hospital admissions in the U.S. are births (3.8 million admissions), followed by coronary atherosclerosis (1.4 million admissions), pneumonia (1.2 million admissions), congestive heart failure (990,000 admissions) and heart attack (774,000 admissions), according to a report by the U.S. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (AHCPR).

The report, which is based on 1996 data, is the latest in a series of statistical publications from AHCPR showing why Americans are hospitalized, how long they stay in the hospital, the procedures they undergo, and the charges for their stays.

According to the report, the most expensive conditions, or diagnoses, treated in U.S. hospitals in 1996, were spinal cord injury ($56,800), infant respiratory distress syndrome ($56,600), low birthweight ($50,300), leukemia ($46,700) and heart valve disorders ($45,300). The figures are average charges for the entire stay.

Overall, patients stayed in the hospital an average of five days. But stays involving premature birth, with problems such as low birthweight and slow growth of the fetus, averaged 23 days. Stays because of infant respiratory distress syndrome averaged 22 days, and patients with spinal cord injuries remained hospitalized an average of 16 days.

The estimates are based on all payer data from AHCPRís Nationwide Inpatient Sample, which approximates a 20-percent sample of U.S. community hospitals. The database is part of the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project, a federal-state-industry partnership to make high-quality hospital data available for research purposes.

Hospital Inpatient Statistics, 1996 (AHCPR 99-0034) is available from the AHCPR Publications Clearinghouse, P.O. Box 8547, Silver Spring, Maryland 20907-8547 (phone: 800-358-9295).

(Why Americans are Hospitalized and What it Costs Detailed in New Government Report. Press Release, August 26, 1999. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, Rockville, MD)


Selected Facts and Figures about Texas

Among the 50 states, Texas is:

(Texas, Where We Stand, November 1999)


Texas HIV/STD Community Resource Directory Available

The Bureau of HIV and STD of the Texas Department of Health has announced the availability of the 1999-2000 edition of the "Texas HIV/STD Community Resource Directory (CRD)."

The CRD is a 280-page guide listing Texas HIV/STD service providers, community based organizations, testing sites, hotline numbers, and other informational and educational resources.

The CRD is free of charge, although orders should be limited to 10 copies. To order, contact the Texas Department of Health Warehouse facility in writing (telephone or walk-up order are not accepted) at:

Texas Department of Health Warehouse
Literature and Forms
1100 West 49th Street
Austin, TX 78756
FAX: (512) 458-7707

When ordering, include the stock number (4-113), quantity (maximum 10), your name, and your shipping address.


Problem Nursing Homes to Face Immediate Sanctions

The Health Care Financing Administration has issued additional instructions to the state agencies that conduct nursing home inspections for Medicare and Medicaid. The instructions require immediate sanctions, such as fines, against nursing homes in more situations - including any time that a nursing home is found to have caused harm to a resident on a consecutive survey. Nursing homes that do not fix the problems will lose their ability to receive Medicare and Medicaid payments.

To encourage sanctions to be imposed more quickly, states also received expanded authority to notify nursing homes when they would be denied payments for new admissions and other sanctions for failing to meet health and safety requirements. In addition, HCA provided guidance for the use of a new enforcement tool that allows fines of up to $10,000 for each serious incident that threatens residents' health and safety. In the past, fines could only be based on the number of days that a nursing home failed to meet federal requirements.

This past year, HCF has taken steps to strengthen the state inspection and enforcement process. Among them, 1) state inspectors were instructed to increase their focus on preventing bedsores, malnutrition and abuse in nursing homes; 2) HCFA established a new requirement for states to focus on complaints alleging harm to residents and conduct investigations within 10 days, and states will continue to be required to investigate complaints alleging the most serious violations within two days; 3) states now must conduct more frequent inspections of nursing homes that have repeated serious violations without decreasing inspections of other facilities; and 4) state inspectors must now make the timing of inspections unpredictable and must conduct some visits on weekends, early mornings and nights to look for quality, safety and staffing problems at those times.


OSHA Revises Compliance Directive for Bloodborne Pathogens

OSHA has issued a new directive revising its 1992 compliance directive for enforcing the standards that cover occupational exposure to bloodborne pathogens and for ensuring consistent inspection procedures. The new directive reflects the availability of advances made in medical technology and improved treatment following exposure.

The new directive emphasizes the importance of an annual review of the employer's bloodborne pathogens programs and the use of safer medical devices, without advocating the use of one device over another. It also highlights basic work practices, personal protective equipment, and administrative controls. The agency will review the 1991 standard on occupational exposure to bloodborne pathogens with regard to possible revision. The directive can be found at: http://www.osha.gov.


Compliance Guidelines for Medicare+Choice Organizations

The HHS Office of the Inspector General has released voluntary compliance guidelines for Medicare+Choice organizations offering coordinated care plans. For all the details of the compliance guidelines, see the November 15, 1999 Federal Register.

The following are some of the OIG's areas of concern:

The OIG and HCFA strongly discourage M+C organizations from using physicians as marketing agents for several reasons:

  1. When a physician act outside his or her traditional role as care provider, the physician's patients may be confused as to when the physician is acting as an agent of the plan, and when the physician is acting in his or her role as a fiduciary to act in the best interests of the patient;
  2. A physician's knowledge of a patient's health status increases the potential for discriminating in favor of Medicare beneficiaries with positive health status when acting as a marketing agent;
  3. Physicians may not be fully aware of membership plan benefits and costs; and
  4. Physicians may not be the best source of membership information for their patients. Therefore, the organization should develop policies to ensure that any provider promotional activities are conducted in accordance with HCFA guidelines (which allow, e.g., the distribution of health plan brochures [exclusive of applications] at a health fair or in their own offices).

The OIG is very concerned about the practice known as "cherry-picking," or selective marketing, in which Medicare+Choice organizations discriminate in the marketing and enrollment process based upon an enrollee's degree of risk for costly or prolonged treatment. Except for individuals who have been medically determined to have end-stage renal disease, a Medicare+Choice organization may not deny, limit or condition the coverage or furnishing of benefits to individuals eligible to enroll in a Medicare+Choice plan offered by the organization on the basis of any factor that is related to health status, including, but not limited to, the following:

  1. Medical condition (including mental illness);
  2. claims experience;
  3. receipt of health care;
  4. medical history;
  5. genetic information;
  6. evidence of insurability; and
  7. disability.
Engaging in practices that would reasonably be expected to have the effect of denying or discouraging enrollment by eligible individuals whose medical condition or history indicates the need for substantial future medical services subjects the Medicare-+Choice organization to a civil money penalty or other sanction, such as suspension of enrollment or suspension of payment.

Disenrollment: Each Medicare+Choice organization must implement policies to ensure that inappropriate disenrollment does not occur. Such policies should include clarification of when it is appropriate for medical personnel to discuss the concept of disenrollment. Generally speaking, the OIG believes it would be inappropriate for medical personnel to initiate discussion of disenrollment or to promote disenrollment (when the topic is initiated by the enrollee), except in the rare circumstance where the Medicare+Choice organization cannot or does not provide the covered medical items or services needed by the patient.

Payment Incentive Plans (PIP): Any PIP operated by a Medicare+Choice organization must comply with the following requirements: First, it may make no payments to physicians (such as offerings of monetary value, including, but not limited to, stock options or waivers of debt) to reduce or limit medically necessary services furnished to any particular enrollee. Second, if the PIP puts a physician o physician group at "substantial financial risk" for referral services, the Medicare+Choice organization must 1) survey current and previously enrolled members to assess access to, and satisfaction with, the quality of services; and 2) assure that there is adequate and appropriate stop-loss protection. Finally, Medicare+Choice organizations must disclose to HCFA certain information regarding their PIPs. These disclosure requirements apply to direct contracting arrangements, as well as subcontracting arrangements.

(American Osteopathic Association Department of Government Relations)


Medicare Announces New Payment System for Home Health

On October 27, 1999, the Health Care Financing Administration proposed rules for a new Medicare payment system to help ensure appropriate reimbursements for quality, efficient home health care. On October 1, 2000, as required by law, Medicare will begin paying all home health agencies under a prospective payment system, as mandated by the Balanced Budget Act of 1997 (BBA) and amended by the Omnibus Consolidated and Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act of 1998.

The new system will complete the transition from the pre-BBA cost-based system.

Under the proposed system:

HCFA published a proposed rule in late October in the Federal Register that details the proposed payment system. The agency plans to publish a final rule this year after responding to the public's comments.

The BBA followed the period from 1990 to 1997 during which Medicare payments to home health agencies grew from $3.7 billion to $17.8 billion, and the average number of visits per beneficiary doubled from 36 to 73.

Medicare has paid hospitals under a prospective payment system since 1983. Medicare began to pay nursing homes under a prospective payment system in 1998. The BBA also requires HCFA to implement prospective payment systems for hospital outpatient services and for rehabilitation hospitals.


AOHA Federal Update


10 Years Ago in the Texas D.O.


Obesity and Overweight in America
Obesity Epidemic Increases Dramatically in the U.S.

A growing obesity epidemic is threatening the health of millions of Americans in the United States, according to Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) research published in the October 27, 1999, issue of The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA).

According to the findings, the obesity epidemic spread rapidly during the 1990s across all states, regions, and demographic groups in the U. S. Obesity (defined as being over 30 percent above ideal body weight) in the population increased from 12 percent in 1991 to 17.9 percent in 1998. The highest increase occurred among the youngest ages (18- to 29-year olds), people with some college education, and people of Hispanic ethnicity. By region, the largest increases were seen in the South with a 67% increase in the number of obese people. Georgia had the largest increase ñ 101%. The findings also show that a major contributor to obesity ñ physical inactivity ñ has not changed substantially between 1991 and 1998.

"Overweight and physical inactivity account for more than 300,000 premature deaths each year in the U.S., second only to tobacco-related deaths. Obesity is an epidemic and should be taken as seriously as any infectious disease epidemic," said Jeffrey P. Koplan, director of the CDC, and one of the authors of the JAMA article. "Obesity and overweight are linked to the nation's number one killer - heart disease ñ as well as diabetes and other chronic conditions."

A national effort is needed to control the epidemic, according to Koplan.

"While obese individuals need to reduce their caloric intake and increase their physical activity, many others must play a role to help these individuals and to prevent a further increase in obesity," Koplan said. "Health care providers must counsel their obese patients; workplaces must offer healthy food choices in their cafeterias and provide opportunities for employees to be physically active on site; schools must offer more physical education that encourages lifelong physical activity; urban policymakers must provide more sidewalks, bike paths, and other alternatives to cars; and parents need to reduce their childrenís TV and computer time and encourage outdoor play. In general restoring physical activity to our daily routines is critical."

According to surveys conducted in 1977-78 and 1994-96, reported daily caloric intakes increased from 2239 Kcal to 2455 Kcal (calories) in men, and from 1534 Kcal to 1646 Kcal in women. Eating more frequently is encouraged by innumerable environmental changes; more food and foods with higher caloric content, the growth of the fast food industry, the increased numbers and marketing of snack foods, increased time for socializing, and a custom of socializing with food and drink.

At the same time, there are fewer opportunities in daily life to burn calories: children watch more television daily; many schools have done away with or cut back on physical education; many neighborhoods lack sidewalks for safe walking; the workplace has become increasingly automated; household chores are assisted by labor-saving machinery; and walking and cycling have been replaced by automobile travel for all but the shortest distances.

According to Koplan, the American lifestyle of convenience and inactivity has had a devastating toll on every segment of society, particularly on children. Research shows that 60% of overweight 5- to 10-year ñold children already have at least one risk factor for heart disease, including hyperlipidemia and elevated blood pressure or insulin levels.

According to CDC research published in the October 13, 1999, issue of JAMA, more than two-thirds of American adults are trying to lose weight or keep from gaining weight but many do not follow guidelines recommending a combination of fewer calories and more physical activity. The 1996 Surgeon Generalís Report on Physical Activity and Health shows that more than 60 percent of adults are not participating in the recommended 30 minutes a day of moderate physical activity most days of the week. The Report stresses that physical activity need not be strenuous to achieve health benefits.

What We Eat in America

More Americans are eating out than ever before, according to results of the 1994-96 Continuing Survey of Food Intakes by Individuals (CSFII) and the Diet and Health Knowledge Survey (DHKS). These surveys, popularly known as What We Eat in America, are conducted by the Agricultural Research Service of the U. S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). The 1994-96 survey collected data on food and nutrient intakes of Americans, behaviors (such as exercise and smoking) that may affect their intakes, and knowledge and attitudes about dietary guidance and health. Interviews with 15,000 individuals of all ages were conducted in 62 geographical areas across the country.

Americans are consuming below the minimum servings recommended for the fruit, dairy and meat groups in the USDAís Food Guide Pyramid. Grain and vegetable consumption is also at the lower ends of the recommended range, and calories from fats and sugars exceed Pyramid recommendations.

The following are selected results from the CSFII:

Physical Activity and Nutrition

Physical inactivity and unhealthy eating are risk behaviors that have a critical impact on health. Together, they are responsible for at least 300,000 preventable deaths each year. Only tobacco use causes more preventable deaths in the U.S.

Good nutrition lowers a personís risk for many chronic diseases, including coronary heart disease, stroke, some types of cancer, diabetes, and osteoporosis. Americans are slowly changing their eating patterns toward healthier diets. However, a considerable gap remains between recommended dietary patterns and what Americans actually eat. Information from the CDCís Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System indicates that only 27% of women and 19% of men eat the recommended five or more servings of fruits and vegetables each day. Although the amounts of total fat, saturated fatty acids, and cholesterol that Americans consume have decreased, they remain above recommended levels for a large proportion of the population.

Despite the proven benefits of being physically active, more than 60% of American adults do not engage in levels of physical activity necessary to provide health benefits. More than one-fourth are not active at all in their leisure time. Activity decreased with age and is less common among women than men and among those with lower incomes and less education.

Regular physical activity improves health in the following ways:


Federal Obesity Clinical Guidelines

In 1998, the first federal guidelines on the identification, evaluation, and treatment of overweight and obesity in adults were released by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), in cooperation with the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK).

The clinical practice guidelines are designed to help physicians in their care of overweight and obesity, a growing public health problem that affects 97 million American adults ñ 55 percent of the population.

"Overweight and obesity pose a major public health challenge. The development of these guidelines was a pioneering achievement since they were the first ever developed by the Institute using an evidence-based model and methodology," said NHLBI Director Dr. Claude Lenfant. "This report will be an invaluable clinical tool for any health care professional who works with overweight or obese patients."

The guidelines present a new approach for the assessment of overweight and obesity and establish principles of safe and effective weight loss. According to the guidelines, assessment of overweight involves evaluation of three key measures ñ body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, and a patientís risk factors for diseases and conditions associated with obesity.

The guidelinesí definition of overweight is based on research which relates body mass index to risk of death and illness. The 24-member expert panel that developed the guidelines identified overweight as a BMI of 25 to 29.9 and obesity as a BMI of 30 and above, which is consistent with the definitions used in many other countries, and supports the Dietary Guidelines for Americans issued in 1995. BMI describes body weight relative to height and is strongly correlated with total body fat content in adults. According to the guidelines, a BMI of 30 is about 30 pounds overweight and is equivalent to 221 pounds in a 6í person and to 186 pounds in someone who is 5í6". The BMI numbers apply to both men and women. Some very muscular people may have a high BMI without health risks.

The panel recommends that BMI be determined in all adults. People of normal weight should have their BMI reassessed in two years.

The guidelines recommend weight loss to lower high blood pressure, to lower high total cholesterol and to raise low levels of HDL, and to lower elevated blood glucose in overweight persons with two or more risk factors and in obese persons. Overweight patients without risk factors should prevent further weight gain, advise the guidelines.

In addition to measuring BMI, health care professionals should evaluate a patientís risk factors, such as elevations in blood pressure or blood cholesterol, or family history of obesity-related disease. At a given level of overweight or obesity, patients with additional risk factors are considered to be at higher risk for health problems, requiring more intensive therapy and modification of any risk factors.

Physicians are also advised to determine waist circumference, which is strongly associated with abdominal fat. Excess abdominal fat is an independent predictor of disease risk. A waist circumference of over 40 inches in men and over 35 inches in women signifies increased risk in those who have a BMI of 25 to 34.9.

According to NHANES III, the trend in the prevalence of overweight and obesity is upward. The guidelines note that from 1960 to 1994, the prevalence of obesity in adults (BMI>30) increased from nearly 13 percent to 22.5 percent of the U. S. population, with most of the increase occurring in the 1990s.

The guidelines were reviewed by 115 health experts, and endorsed by the coordinating committees of the National Cholesterol Education Program and the National High Blood Pressure Education Program, the North American Association for the Study of Obesity, the NIDDK Task Force on the Prevention and Treatment of Obesity, and the American Heart Association.

Clinical Guidelines on the Identification, Evaluation, and Treatment of Overweight and Obesity in Adults can be found at: www.nhlbi.nih.gov.

Return to Top